Solvation energy is one of the major contribution to binding energy of a ligand to a biologically active protein and is the contribution mostly responsible for the protein selectivity. Although nothing can, probably, better approximate the interaction with water molecules than a sufficiently long molecular dynamics run in an all-atom force field, out of necessity we decided to try our best in ascribing as much physical meaning to Generalized Born models as it can be possibly made.
To do that (see our recent “Fast Surface Based Electrostatics for biomolecules modeling” preprint) we start from the classic GB approximate expression for the solvation energy and re-interpret it as a direct definition of the reaction field potential:
Here
Therefore, the polarization charge density can be a sanity check both for the direct reaction field potential interpretation and for an estimate of the Born radii calculation accuracy. The obvious requirement is the overall neutrality of the combined molecule and water system:
Well, it does not look good at all. The results on the graph above show not a correlation, but rather a distribution. The total water polarization charge anti-correlates with the macromolecule charge (as it should), though not ideally. This is a common deficiency of all Generalized Born models, but one. In fact it is possible to construct an approximation for the Born radius and enforce the neutrality at once. We will discuss it in our future posts.
Related posts:
- How to use Born surface charges to calculate solvation energy?
- Three great ways to calculate Born radii beyond the Coulomb Field Approximation
- O(N) Surface Charges Generalized Born calculation demonstration
- Non-polar contribution to solvation energy from Born models:
- Protein solvation energies and GB surface charges: perfect match!
Fantastic, I didn’t know about this topic up to the present. Thanx!!
Please consult with our latest arXiv:0908.1708 for more details.