<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Water polarization charges in Generalized Born models.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://q-pharm.com/2009/11/water-polarization-charges-in-generalized-born-models/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://q-pharm.com/2009/11/water-polarization-charges-in-generalized-born-models/</link>
	<description>The drug discovery company</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FFT acceleration demonstration for (surface)GB methods</title>
		<link>http://q-pharm.com/2009/11/water-polarization-charges-in-generalized-born-models/comment-page-1/#comment-618</link>
		<dc:creator>FFT acceleration demonstration for (surface)GB methods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 13:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://q-pharm.com/?p=90#comment-618</guid>
		<description>[...]  calculation of the Born radii. As soon as we were able to employ SCGB model expressions for the surface charges density to obtain the solvation energies in linear time as well. The results of the calculations and the comparison of the calculated values [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  calculation of the Born radii. As soon as we were able to employ SCGB model expressions for the surface charges density to obtain the solvation energies in linear time as well. The results of the calculations and the comparison of the calculated values [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quantum » Blog Archive » Effects of the surface density on the stability of surface electrostatics models</title>
		<link>http://q-pharm.com/2009/11/water-polarization-charges-in-generalized-born-models/comment-page-1/#comment-600</link>
		<dc:creator>Quantum » Blog Archive » Effects of the surface density on the stability of surface electrostatics models</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 05:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://q-pharm.com/?p=90#comment-600</guid>
		<description>[...] charges GB methods, SCGB(3) is the most accurate. It is also the only method producing correct surface polarization charge for an arbitrary molecule. The analysis show that surface-based GB models are stable and can be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] charges GB methods, SCGB(3) is the most accurate. It is also the only method producing correct surface polarization charge for an arbitrary molecule. The analysis show that surface-based GB models are stable and can be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quantum » Blog Archive » Surface GB models: the ultimate test</title>
		<link>http://q-pharm.com/2009/11/water-polarization-charges-in-generalized-born-models/comment-page-1/#comment-595</link>
		<dc:creator>Quantum » Blog Archive » Surface GB models: the ultimate test</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 18:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://q-pharm.com/?p=90#comment-595</guid>
		<description>[...] above shows the relative performance of the two surface Generalized Born approaches, FSBE(6) and SCGB(3). The two demonstrate roughly the same level of errors (as compared to the PBE solution, the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] above shows the relative performance of the two surface Generalized Born approaches, FSBE(6) and SCGB(3). The two demonstrate roughly the same level of errors (as compared to the PBE solution, the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Fedichev, Quantum CTO</title>
		<link>http://q-pharm.com/2009/11/water-polarization-charges-in-generalized-born-models/comment-page-1/#comment-366</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Fedichev, Quantum CTO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 18:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://q-pharm.com/?p=90#comment-366</guid>
		<description>Please consult with our latest &lt;a href=&quot;http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/0908.1708&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;arXiv:0908.1708&lt;/a&gt; for more details.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please consult with our latest <a href="http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/0908.1708" rel="nofollow">arXiv:0908.1708</a> for more details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: volorryisdiva</title>
		<link>http://q-pharm.com/2009/11/water-polarization-charges-in-generalized-born-models/comment-page-1/#comment-332</link>
		<dc:creator>volorryisdiva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://q-pharm.com/?p=90#comment-332</guid>
		<description>Fantastic, I didn&#039;t know about this topic up to the present. Thanx!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic, I didn&#8217;t know about this topic up to the present. Thanx!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

