<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Quantum Discovery Labs &#187; GPCR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://q-pharm.com/category/gpcr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://q-pharm.com</link>
	<description>The drug discovery company</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:47:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How good are biological data &#8211; II: Trombine, GSK, GPCR</title>
		<link>http://q-pharm.com/2007/12/how-good-are-biological-data-ii-trombine-gsk-gpcr/</link>
		<comments>http://q-pharm.com/2007/12/how-good-are-biological-data-ii-trombine-gsk-gpcr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 08:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fedichev</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GPCR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HERG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IC50]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[openbabel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trombine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://q-pharm.com/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many bindign affinity prediction methods, such as scores and QSAR models,  rely on availability of accurate information on binding constants. The figure on the left is a result of [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://q-pharm.com/2007/12/how-good-are-biological-experiments-herg-binding-data-analysis/' rel='bookmark' title='How good are biological experiments? HERG binding data analysis'>How good are biological experiments? HERG binding data analysis</a></li>
<li><a href='http://q-pharm.com/2008/09/from-biological-spectra-multiple-protein-binding-data-to-pharmacological-profiling/' rel='bookmark' title='From Biological Spectra (multiple protein binding data) to pharmacological profiling!'>From Biological Spectra (multiple protein binding data) to pharmacological profiling!</a></li>
<li><a href='http://q-pharm.com/2008/01/herg-binding-prediction-quality-q-herg-model-vs-experiments/' rel='bookmark' title='HERG binding prediction quality: q-HERG model vs. experiments'>HERG binding prediction quality: q-HERG model vs. experiments</a></li>
<li><a href='http://q-pharm.com/2008/06/docking-validation-study-classic-example-thrombine/' rel='bookmark' title='Docking validation study: classic example, thrombine'>Docking validation study: classic example, thrombine</a></li>
<li><a href='http://q-pharm.com/2007/01/what-makes-a-correct-binding-energy-calculation/' rel='bookmark' title='What makes a correct binding energy calculation?'>What makes a correct binding energy calculation?</a></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://q-pharm.com/2007/12/how-good-are-biological-data-ii-trombine-gsk-gpcr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

