Quantum Pharmaceuticals
Quantum Pharmaceuticals is a technology based drug discovery company. We develop a unique computational drug discovery platform (QUANTUM), provide drug discovery services, and pursue our own in-house drug discovery projects searching for novel compounds with anti-bacterial, anti-viral and anti-cancer efficacy.
Quantum@linkedin.com
Contacts: office@q-pharm.com or comment any post on the site. You are welcome!Subscription Options:
Categories
- absorbtion (3)
- active transport (2)
- ADME (4)
- albumin (1)
- antibiotics (1)
- antiviral (4)
- bioavailability (3)
- cancer (3)
- cardiotoxicity (1)
- collaboration (13)
- compound libraries (1)
- COPD (1)
- docking (12)
- drug design (4)
- drug discovery platform (1)
- druglikeness (4)
- false postive (3)
- flue (1)
- Generalized Born (15)
- GPCR (1)
- HERG (6)
- HIV (2)
- HIV-1 integrase (1)
- HSV (1)
- human neutrophil elastase (1)
- IC50 (18)
- inflammation (3)
- kinase (1)
- LD50 (2)
- logP (1)
- mechanism of action exploration (2)
- MRDD (3)
- new therapeutic uses (1)
- oncology (4)
- openbabel (3)
- PDK1 (1)
- polar liquid (16)
- publications (10)
- q-Mol (1)
- QSAR (1)
- Quantum Software (10)
- RecA (1)
- scoring (1)
- selectivity (3)
- solvation energy (18)
- ss DNA (1)
- talk (5)
- toxicity (7)
- trombine (2)
- tuberculosis (3)
- Uncategorized (4)
- video (3)
- water (19)
Recent comments
- Talk@MIPT (in Russian) on Video recorded from "Water as a ferroelectric…" presentation at MIPT, November 5th, 2008
- FFT acceleration demonstration for (surface)GB methods on Water polarization charges in Generalized Born models.
- FFT acceleration demonstration for (surface)GB methods on O(N) Surface Charges Generalized Born calculation demonstration
- FFT acceleration demonstration for (surface)GB methods on O(N) SCGB solvation models: first “blood”
- FFT acceleration demonstration for (surface)GB methods on How to use Born surface charges to calculate solvation energy?
toxicity Archive
-
Does size matter?
Posted on April 23, 2010 | View CommentsThe goal of drug discovery is to find potent and selective inhibitors for particular targets. A good ligand thus should be small (for better bio-availability) and potent. The larger is the inhibitor, the more there are ways to interact with specific features of a certain... -
Do we need those nM-inhibitors?
Posted on November 11, 2009 | View CommentsIt’s “well known” that we all need to find the stronger inhibitors against any specific therapeutic target as possible. The motivation is that the strongest inhibitors are most probably less toxic. It’s so obvious and thus needs to be checked. To do so we took... -
How drug-like are vendor libraries?
Posted on October 26, 2009 | View CommentsWe use a few chemical compounds vendors in our drug discovery programs (let us call them “Provider I”, “Provider II”, and “Provider III”). Nowadays chemicals providers normally claim about 1M of drug-like compounds readily available for shipping at a very reasonable cost. A few dozen... -
From Biological Spectra (multiple protein binding data) to pharmacological profiling!
Posted on September 25, 2008 | View CommentsAn ideal drug cures a decease and does not kill a patient (or even lab animals in the course of preclinical testing). Usual drug discovery paradigm is based on studying a compound’s properties against a specific, normally decease-related (protein) target. The ability of a compound... -
LD50 vs. MRDD: what’s death for a mice is good enough for a man
Posted on January 25, 2008 | View CommentsPrediction of toxic properties of small drug like molecules is a big challenge both from theoretical and practical points of view. Quantitatively people use different measures of toxicity such as Maximum Recommended Daily Dose (MRDD) or Lethal Dose (LD50). Accurate prediction of such endpoints is...